Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!news.mv.net!newspump.sol.net!post2.nntp.sol.net!posts.news.twtelecom.net!nnrp3.twtelecom.net!not-for-mail From: DrMajorBob Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica Subject: Re: Undo/Redo Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 10:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Steven M. Christensen and Associates, Inc and MathTensor, Inc. Sender: steve@smc.vnet.net Approved: Steven M. Christensen , Moderator Message-ID: Lines: 28 NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 May 2011 09:35:03 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 98abc764.news.twtelecom.net X-Trace: DXC=J@3m9n>SEbdm_i:024=]AkC_A=>8kQj6mY;@_o827nGc=9Zm4XKEbDoEFiONJ7[GofgGPiN7J1^Xb X-Complaints-To: abuse@twtelecom.net Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica:2098 Programmatically rewriting Input cells seems, to me, a very silly thing to do. Bobby On Tue, 03 May 2011 04:47:25 -0500, Murray Eisenberg wrote: > No, Input cells need not be "static": you could programmatically rewrite > them! > > On 5/2/2011 6:52 AM, Sebastian Hofer wrote: > >> As far as I am concerned, it is not about reverting the state of the >> computational state of the session. I am not interested in that. What I >> am interested in is to undo changes I made to _input_ cells! And this >> is static text. Without a working undo feature work is lost easily if >> you don't hit save every other keystroke. Also deleting a bunch of >> cells happens pretty quickly. I too think that every modern software >> should provide this feature. And saying that it is a complex task to >> integrate it into Mathematica sounds like a pretty lame excuse to me. > > -- DrMajorBob@yahoo.com