Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: About getting more speed out of processors. Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:23:08 +0100 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <61de1a4c-8611-49a0-9a09-2ea2c5ae26bbn@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 14:23:08 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="78ae535749c466e3ee6e6da630c1a2dd"; logging-data="3289618"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19smcHhIVi6nzHASuLLjCqzzJPRkwAcNK+DDTEDw/SH6A==" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:3i3vQ9IVRGpx7YYql2wdC3qu5qY= In-Reply-To: <61de1a4c-8611-49a0-9a09-2ea2c5ae26bbn@googlegroups.com> Content-Language: en-GB Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:15405 On 28/07/2022 3:16 pm, K wrote: > From the fact, that the spaces have grown incredibly. > Wouldn't it be a good idea to store procedure results to get > more speed out of the processors ? Or is it already done ? The idea is over half a century old. See Wilkes, "Slave Memories and Dynamic Storage Allocation," IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers, Offsite LinkVol. EC-1.4, Issue: 2Offsite Link, (April 1965) 270-271. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within