Path: csiph.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!odin.sdf-eu.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ike Naar Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 16:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Organization: SDF Public Access UNIX System, Est. 1987 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <86wp4w3sz5.fsf@toledo.com> <87shfjpzgs.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <878thaq4ff.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87efr17b3g.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87fubgghsi.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87k20qb3vy.fsf@bsb.me.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: iceland.sdf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: odin.sdf-eu.org 1506272110 26304 205.166.94.5 (24 Sep 2017 16:55:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@odin.sdf-eu.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 16:55:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (NetBSD) Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:8041 On 2017-09-23, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > William Elliot writes: >> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>> William Elliot writes: >>> > On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>> >> Who is "we"? >>> > >>> > Those of us who wrote, learned and taught math in plain text ascii on >>> > Usenet. >>> >>> Ah, right. It's an odd word to use since I too learned that but I >>> appear not to be included in the "we". >> >> We stuck with ascii. > > I am still not included in the "we" so it's wrong to talk about "we" > having done anything. *You* stuck with ASCII, and I hope it turns out > to be a good choice for you. Some languages have different words for different uses of "we". For example, in the Indonesian language, there is - kami : "we" (the speaker and others) excluding the person(s) one is talking to ("we, but not you"). - kita: "we" (the speaker and others) including the person(s) one is talking to ("we, and that means you too"). English does not differentiate between those use cases.