Path: csiph.com!au2pb.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.fcku.it!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bartekltg Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: Researches in quantum computing seem to progress only extremely slowly Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 02:31:52 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <34teuahtcltdi1mrq4gj95bu8gacjv112i@4ax.com> <0a1fua58g3o3sbe715rv0ugvvkkdd06lvr@4ax.com> <3vefualelae74fhsmcs0elv5us837istlh@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 8yDXz2POMePMu60eIS0/Vw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:5816 On 05.09.2015 02:11, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> "bartekltg" wrote in message news:msd7gj$5hh$1@speranza.aioe.org... > > [...] >> How I get 32768 bit pseudorandom sequences? > > You spend a long time on: > > https://www.random.org They claim this are random numbers, not pseudorandom. If it is on the Internet it must be true. > ? > ;^) ;-) Not long ago I have used quite big computer do to some computations. 20% of computing time was random number generation. It ran two weeks. I have no idea how many random bits it generated, but I think computer mice used to click on the page would cost more than this computer;-) bartekltg