Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: About mathematics of probability... Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:02:13 +0000 Organization: go, ion artisan! Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 13:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="bbec9967c55d39f11ca29ee1f0b15ce1"; logging-data="12758"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/yU5ab5pLoYUqu79rYh+LDvuqCs1462xvnVAD0wdqG/A==" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:w2xPbFkohsLCgAzdfaQzosWDG+g= Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:5341 On 22/03/15 00:16, Ramine wrote: > > Hello, > > I have come to an interresting subject, Not to most of us. > i was thinking and thinking more.. You say this quite often, but it might be useful for you to provide some evidence to support the claim. > As i said before , in mathematics of probability we say that if an event > have a probability 1/1000000000 to appear that means that the event is > very improbable to appear , but what i want to exaplin is that > this is not a proof that it will not appear, Everybody else already knows this. What makes you think we don't? -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within