Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.nask.pl!news.nask.org.pl!news.internetia.pl!not-for-mail From: bartek szurgot Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: good UML editor Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:02:28 +0200 Organization: Netia S.A. Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-181-131-177.internetia.net.pl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: mx1.internetia.pl 1343207158 4075 93.181.131.177 (25 Jul 2012 09:05:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@inetia.pl NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:05:58 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: X-Tech-Contact: usenet@internetia.pl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 X-Server-Info: http://www.internetia.pl/ Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:2002 On 07/23/2012 04:34 PM, bob wrote: > Can someone recommend a good UML editor? > > Also, does the typical programmer pay for a UML editor? And, does the typical programmer even use a UML editor? > > Thanks. i sometimes use free bouml editor to visual some top-level dependencies and the most important design/architecture parts. IMHO making too low-level diagrams takes FAR more time than just changing the code (and automated tests). AFAIK generating code from diagrams is near-to-dead trend nowadays. -- pozdrawiam serdecznie / best regards, bartek szurgot /* http://www.baszerr.eu */