Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.programming
Subject: Re: Here is why C++ and C are bad...
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 10:16:52 +1300
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <deivu4FsqnhU7@mid.individual.net>
References: <n5kdn4$cji$1@dont-email.me> <n5uqdd$gin$1@dont-email.me> <n5v0di$7i3$1@dont-email.me> <n5v0p5$8s3$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net +1WEe0IbnXZZfQ5QVUXIxQ5JIrtiixJufNaXj/zE8hgBjMfbPE
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LQBjWrPG686YA4w8D3M1ILQCFp0=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
In-Reply-To: <n5v0p5$8s3$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:6116

Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 29/12/15 22:13, David Brown wrote:
>> On 29/12/15 21:31, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>> On 26/12/15 00:54, Ramine wrote:
>>>>
>> <snip>
>>>
>>> Your article says a lot more about your programming style than it does
>>> about either C or C++.
>>>
>>
>> While your post was technically correct, you are missing one critical
>> detail - Ramine is a write-only bot, and never reads anything that is
>> posted.
>
> There is a very, very, very small body of evidence to the contrary.
> Practically microscopic, in fact, but nevertheless non-zero.

So microscopic that I'm sure my host (N.I.N) filters out his posts as 
spam.  So now my "ignore thread" filters can't block replies to its posts!

-- 
Ian Collins