Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 17:03:30 +0100
From: Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.programming
Subject: Re: Perl or PHP?
References: <l9mruq$pn8$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In-Reply-To: <l9mruq$pn8$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <db93pa-d0p.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan>
Lines: 25
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:980:9089:1:d7c:bc08:8c3c:1493
X-Trace: 1388246701 news.xs4all.nl 2846 [2001:980:9089:1:d7c:bc08:8c3c:1493]:37508
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:4057

On 28-12-2013 16:49, Victor Porton wrote:
> I consider to make a startup (a Web site with many MySQL InnoDB queries on
> each page) and hope to sell it to Google.
>
> Perl or PHP? Please be argumented.
>
> First, whose performance is greater: Perl or PHP?
>

~/temp> time ./test.pl >test.tmp

real    0m0.004s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.004s
~/temp> time ./test.php >test.tmp

real    0m0.042s
user    0m0.026s
sys     0m0.016s
luuk@opensuse:~/temp>


But the question of course is, what are your comparing?

;-)