Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: blmblm@myrealbox.com Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: fortran 77 errors Date: 23 Jun 2011 17:06:26 GMT Organization: None Lines: 22 Message-ID: <96ha4hFr09U3@mid.individual.net> References: <4e025412$0$1945$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> <4e026d84$0$952$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> X-Trace: individual.net YltKLsUixxBsxDpi0RK1LgWqkWfkizdzBuCjOc2eNIxx7b0P+N X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:g1uDkNOxdRNGusQ4eGRjBcVjquo= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.programming:513 In article , Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 6/22/2011 3:31 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote: > > James Waldby wrote: [ snip ] > > I have looked at python. It's hard to understand. fortran in what I've > > seen looks simpler to learn. That or C++. I like C and I'm not going to give > > up on it but it gives me problems quite a bit. > > What type of problems? Depending on the issues you are facing, Fortran > may not be any improvement over C. > Indeed. Bill has been posting questions about C to comp.lang.c for some years, and -- well, if you're really curious, possibly searching the newsgroup's archives for posts by him will be instructive. -- B. L. Massingill ObDisclaimer: I don't speak for my employers; they return the favor.