Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ben Bacarisse Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: Is Pascal utterly useless? Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 23:07:47 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 11 Message-ID: <87zhkrkyq4.fsf@bsb.me.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="acccf481fee0543503e363feec71f477"; logging-data="29608"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18C/7rUHDwNftiB7DXi0beEA2SQU2Jn4d8=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:kZs5bUZNS+U6qNd6l33019l1lDk= sha1:w96AtwEbUMW1XxN90Ap9XkXwhck= X-BSB-Auth: 1.350c0c32a32ca4dc41f3.20190802230747BST.87zhkrkyq4.fsf@bsb.me.uk Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:10113 Peter Percival writes: > Does ISO 7185 Pascal require program source to be just one file? And > if it does, doesn't that make it an utterly useless language? In a nutshell, yes, It's ISO 10206 -- Extended Pascal that adds modules. (Caveat: not a Pascal expert.) -- Ben.