Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ben Bacarisse Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: on 2^O(lg n) being a polynomial Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:12:06 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: <87inmsut09.fsf@bsb.me.uk> References: <86lgrudu6c.fsf@toledo.com> <87vaqtwn2a.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <86vaqtasm5.fsf@toledo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="93eaece5ee1a59cec50ea92cffff1d06"; logging-data="5551"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ti33OTFNLYGp9M7wmqSOGIAuyMkhg0rc=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:Jt2SasGrxgjezNadmzz1qcQ701w= sha1:/AhI24+7ZqhdwE2VyL5trgwpw24= X-BSB-Auth: 1.9c7b6059ab8028255710.20170329141206BST.87inmsut09.fsf@bsb.me.uk Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:7674 Daniel Bastos writes: > Ben Bacarisse writes: >> Daniel Bastos writes: >> >>> Here's an argument to prove that 2^O(lg n) is a polynomial. >> >> You are tripping up over your terminology. 2^O(lg n) is a set of >> functions ans do can't be polynomial. You can't even say that the > > What was supposed to be written here? ``ans do''? If this is latin, I > need help. I assumed it was a typo, but can't fix it myself. "and so". The d and s got swapped. I think you got the other points which were the important ones. -- Ben.