Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED.RgOiiUXeukNnxPINek13pA.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail From: Louis Valence Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: Is MIX utterly silly? Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 17:01:56 -0300 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 19 Message-ID: <861rxbtzuz.fsf@example.com> References: <4llmle9n5ggun2iq6efttla2t4fir3a08j@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: RgOiiUXeukNnxPINek13pA.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:HGcy2VclRsWmCqtzKfptnHVHnAc= X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:10166 Peter Percival writes: > Robert Wessel wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:52:54 +0100, Peter Percival >> wrote: >> >>> That's MIX as in vol 1 of AoCP. I know Knuth and his books are highly >>> regarded, but MIX is an April fool's joke, isn't it? (Fool's/fools' not >>> sure which.) >> >> >> No, it's not. But he has come up with a more modern ISA (RISC-ish) >> for newer editions of the books, MMIX. >> >> He offers a justification for MIX in the beginning of volume 1. > > I find it unconvincing! Why?