Path: csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de>
Newsgroups: comp.programming
Subject: Re: An advantage of RSA encryption
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 23:05:08 +0200
Organization: albasani.net
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <55C12904.9020702@t-online.de>
References: <mpimf8$cc7$1@news.albasani.net> <mpj2fj$361$1@news.albasani.net> <mpjc91$jt2$1@news.albasani.net> <mplkff$vol$1@news.albasani.net> <mplpk5$9n6$1@news.albasani.net> <20150803102300.194@kylheku.com> <mpqc3n$1q6$1@news.albasani.net> <mpqd07$f8r$1@dont-email.me> <mpqden$416$4@news.albasani.net> <20150804082415.66@kylheku.com> <55C11C23.9000503@t-online.de> <mpr811$vgc$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.albasani.net WxJ6r5gfHxh7xQH2/NAuMDqyUIJy3Ig5PbjBfzMRHEJQiEA2Myts7nhtTQiMwxvZYGm8eNeLsGlnrIvFL1XnGM/wbrqh8JxgteLjjmX1v8gUS/Nw3tUTVcEjXsJd9Kqr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:05:06 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="sESzcMwd+f1+kppkziYybpoVr6dUg5RpJX5RhBpWKHnbosKgjZzMzGFPCVp3U0cDL7FuZXoY3wjclhTqR6W74H/AAYxs/xjWZ9LW3gAeOJpTR2hx8xLlh2sntSh/wG1+ceIGzIVsUwosVwMa/lOOZKjSr0BlMgzj84711v6F6+c="; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
To: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <mpr811$vgc$2@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JovM/xapgYcev3YsuAX2jAglqak=
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:5573

Am 04.08.2015 um 22:42 schrieb Richard Heathfield:
> On 04/08/15 21:10, Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
>> Am 04.08.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Kaz Kylheku:
>>> On 2015-08-04, Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>> ok. Then please comment on what I wrote in parentheses.
>>>
>>> (dumb as a brick)
>>>
>> If you have good arguments, then give them. You are welcome to
>> aid Heathfield in his argumentation.
>
> It's the other way round. I was expanding on Kaz's contribution, not he
> on mine. Kaz knows a damn sight more about cryptography than I do.

This is not important for the discussion. Important are your
objective counterarguments to mine, if any.

M. K. Shen