Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: aminer <aminer@toto.ca>
Newsgroups: comp.programming
Subject: Re: Parallel archiver using my ParallelZlib is here...
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:47:06 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <5122D99A.1080006@toto.ca>
References: <kfmr7l$tec$1@dont-email.me> <kfmusn$akh$2@dont-email.me> <0d594a6d-6353-4aea-97f3-4f8ac908c778@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8427fd05edc201bb6b1d125b80ca38e6"; logging-data="32347"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX198eYRw9BNka3f/32M+89H8ctaX/h4V7IY="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
In-Reply-To: <0d594a6d-6353-4aea-97f3-4f8ac908c778@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mQHwacCCMJ92RRwwHaqgsNpjJPo=
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:3039

On 2/18/2013 8:56 AM, bob wrote:
> On Friday, February 15, 2013 9:37:43 PM UTC-6, aminer wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I want to add an important thing...
>>
>>
>>
>> I have designed my parallel archiver 1.0  to be fault tolerant to power
>>
>> failures etc.
>>
>>
>>
>> You have to call the LoadIndex() method just  after you create
>>
>> you object with the constructor and it will be fault tolerant.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Amine Moulay Ramdane.
>
> How much faster does it operate when you go from using 1 thread to using 2 threads?


My parallel archiver is using Parallel Zlib so it's  fast, so since
Parrallel Zlib is fast , the P (parallel part) of the Amdahl equation is 
much smaller than with Parallel Bzip, so since it's using a lot the 
memory and the harddisk also, it gives 2.5x speed with 4 threads on 4 
cores. And thats not so bad since we are speeding up the things 2.5x 
times, ParallelBzip is mush slower, so the P part is much bigger than with
Parallel Zlib , and it gives over 3.4x speed with Parallel Bzip.



Thank's,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.