Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kaz Kylheku Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: really? (lame question about primes) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 22:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 13 Message-ID: <20150901155108.349@kylheku.com> References: <5e5de47a-7353-4ffc-9f5d-ec083d1d63ba@googlegroups.com> <44a165dc-8447-4ae0-8695-557a7ddf00cf@googlegroups.com> <_RfFx.418341$bt.398932@fx32.am4> NNTP-Posting-Host: OGJi3KNpFOhM58UHZwXj0w.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-18 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:5695 On 2015-09-01, fir wrote: > W dniu wtorek, 1 września 2015 13:20:29 UTC+2 użytkownik Richard Heathfield napisał: >> There are only 9*10^299 300-digit numbers, so we need to test 81*10^598 >> = 8.1*10^599 pairs. >> > preposterous bullshit - i said that A length is strictly related to B length You can demonstrate your superior intellect by winning some prime factorization contest, like this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Factoring_Challenge#The_prizes_and_records Plus you can earn tens of thousands of dollars.