Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>
Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads
Subject: About Parallel For..
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:15:07 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <ppltlb$tl3$6@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:15:07 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5166d391c4de4b9e0439a2f9dda30010"; logging-data="30371"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18VRIbD4EKMBKqUMuVSdsaKtZgRZwZjLHI="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lY7ikJTFijYp7hmBn4Qge6dj7TI=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.eternal-september.org:119
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming.threads:4668

Hello,

Read this:

About Parallel For..

I have just read the following webpage about the implementation of 
Parallel For, here it is:

PARALLEL PROGRAMMING IN DELPHI PART I. PARALLEL FOR

https://vitaliburkov.wordpress.com/2011/10/15/parallel-programming-in-delphi/

And i think that Parallel For that is implemented in a library is not 
efficient, because i think that Parallel For has to be implemented in
a sophisticated manner by the compiler, but i think that sophisticated 
automatic parallelization by compilers has failed, so i think that i 
will not implement a Parallel For.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.