Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Sky89 Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads Subject: I think i have found another problem about garbage collecting.. Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 22:16:40 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 02:16:58 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f80612b83378842e152c6e67de07aaa3"; logging-data="13630"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18yYf57GA4WKgwuRadDNCaj" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 Content-Language: en-US X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.eternal-september.org:119 Cancel-Lock: sha1:hMnJGzka1LDUzHkiVBO2nLA374w= Xref: csiph.com comp.programming.threads:4248 Hello.. I think i have found another problem about garbage collecting.. When you want to "force" garbage collecting in Java and C# and the like to free "immediatly" the memory to optimize more the system, this will be "expensive", it is like you will make the serial part of a parallel program "bigger", because Java and C# are amortizing garbage collecting by not running it "every" time to collect each object.. this is the big problem of garbage collecting of Java and C# and the like, and now i am becoming more smart. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.