Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>
Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads
Subject: Again about Lockfree algorithms
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 13:24:22 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <pccs8o$dm$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 17:24:40 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f57dd1298cbed2a368279619c2b94b2b"; logging-data="438"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2f1iqQAmkb6EXlUlcuUBX"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
Content-Language: en-US
X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.eternal-september.org:119
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Wtf2Afn4aIwhD7g/qmwkMwiEj7Q=
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming.threads:4238

Hello..


Again about Lockfree algorithms

I wrote in my previous post about Lockfree algorithms,
i think that Lockfree algorithms without an appropriate Backoff
algorithm and a Jitter are not efficient, so you have to add the 
following Backoff+Jitter and Lockfree algorithms will become more 
efficient than Lock based algorithms, read the following carefully:

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/architecture/exponential-backoff-and-jitter/


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.