Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads,comp.programming,comp.arch
Subject: Re: And improved algorithm of a concurrent FIFO queue
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 05:38:53 +0200
Organization: None
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <lkc9sd$qf$1@solani.org>
References: <lkbvi7$588$1@news.albasani.net> <lkc41r$ehc$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: solani.org 1399433933 847 eJwFwYEBwDAEBMCVfHhiHKH2H6F3VId3mNONyw28eXEhSb9QPRmNPdzpsinF6kFlbYt8Tv0BDUcQww== (7 May 2014 03:38:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 03:38:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwDAEBMCVSPxjnCL2H6F3uFS2G0HDYtNZc0T8LZ76FzlKngrYFWPFFLANjTjDzh8NqBCH
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EKjmYJxSEjXGFrR+1CpbJSIOK0g=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwFwYEBACAEBMCVKI/G4cv+I3SH7eoMc7hhMGFFubu7cqWnRKdIBiCjVD1rWCBxZh7vex8VIxGQ
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming.threads:2310 comp.programming:4381 comp.arch:21554

On Tue, 6 May 2014 18:59:07 -0700
"Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> wrote:

> > "animer":
> 
> > my new and improved algorithm has now 50% better throughput on the
> > pop() side than the following Chris Thomasson concurrent FIFO queue
> > that uses the bakery algorithm, and it has the same throughput on
> > the push() side than the following Chriss Thomasson concurrent FIFO
> > Queue.
> 
> 50% better throughput on the pop side! AFAICT, that is a total
> crock of fuc%ing bullshi%! Anyway, what the hell are all of those
> nasty Sleep(0)'s littered around your code?

I guess that he expects same behavior both on Unices and Windows.
This is not the case. He should use sched_yield at least on Linux...


-- 
Click OK to continue...