Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads
Subject: Re: Comparison of various synchronization mechanisms?
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:09:04 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <4E4BCB80.6ECB7053@web.de>
References: <0ddf3aed-90df-4cf0-ac3f-7ca6a07ae638@w11g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: terekhov@web.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="MCbSEzW5qwGLFMNXJh39IQ"; logging-data="17304"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18A0ptvksbqmU96VVVhWDi5x5QpX5Zc7SM="
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TDmnEfnxYm29pda16sX8V4GuQJ0=
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.programming.threads:515


Papa Stratos wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Is anyone aware of a material (book or online) comparing or discusses
> said synchronization mechanisms?  For instance, I am interested
> knowing which would wake all waiting threads (thundering herd) versus
> one waiting thread.  If it compares across platforms, the better.

What is your real problem regarding (all/one) waiting thread(s), Papa?

Please explain.

regards,
alexander.