Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alexander Terekhov Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads Subject: Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 14:06:45 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4DFC94D5.1CCB4B8D@web.de> References: <43eb372b-6517-4914-b647-860f1f7136ba@k15g2000pri.googlegroups.com><87boxyfctc.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk> <4DF9D581.E607BEB4@web.de><8739jaf59n.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk> <4DF9EF9A.911CC74F@web.de><87wrgm9bxk.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk> <4DFA18D0.3A413EED@web.de><87oc1xajr3.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk> <4DFA2342.52931D8@web.de><87k4clai0h.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk><87boxxahfj.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk><98uKp.16038$SG4.15177@newsfe03.iad><2671e224-80a9-4e11-a224-64240676069f@y27g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <871uyt3pns.fsf@justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk> <9uQKp.19806$F25.16380@newsfe04.iad> Reply-To: terekhov@web.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="MCbSEzW5qwGLFMNXJh39IQ"; logging-data="27700"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19iof55DMg0LHCg7WBcDDZZaoWQSkfRxsY=" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en Cancel-Lock: sha1:y+cGFGOqZV2XF671CkAtGhNEiXQ= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.programming.threads:322 "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote: [...] > I don't think that acq_rel barrier is enough for this because it does not > seem as if it's required to generate a `StoreLoad' barrier on a SPARC... I agree that acq_rel fence does not provide `StoreLoad' on SPARC. http://www.decadent.org.uk/pipermail/cpp-threads/2008-December/001949.html regards, alexander.