Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.stack.nl!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Rod Pemberton" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: Stack overflow: how to monitor stack usage? Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 16:28:25 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <53d15c6d$0$2178$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <53d2af49$0$2201$426a34cc@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: CNsg4fVcCsvs3UaOgZtQCw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Linux) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.msdos.programmer:1451 On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:26:01 -0400, Mateusz Viste wrote: > So either TC3 is handling such daisy-chaining in an inherently better > way than Turbo C 2, or... no idea - TC3 is handling stack differently, > or something.. Anyway, since the stack seems to behave well now, the > problem is somehow solved - I guess I will just stick to TC3 now. > If you're curious, you could always compare the disassembly to see what's different. Once you know, you could make it work for TC2 too. Rod Pmeberton