Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mechanic Newsgroups: alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.ubuntu,comp.os.linux.networking Subject: Re: How to set up a spare Linksys WRT54Gv2 as a wired access point network extender Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:45:27 +0000 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <9b626$531df921$43da7656$19279@nntpswitch.blueworldhosting.com> <87wqg1m37t.fld@apaflo.com> <1ihvh9p3mvq5bobp4584cqukk8h7q1qfms@4ax.com> <87siqnnb2u.fld@apaflo.com> <87bnxamfoe.fld@apaflo.com> <8761nhl7v8.fld@apaflo.com> <87r465j721.fld@apaflo.com> <12egoeyciezgx$.dlg@example1357.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: cwrp5dCis7qkE3JgUrKgQA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.networking:2846 On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:02:25 -0700, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote: > There was discussion about crosstalk at the terminations, where > crosstalk occurs. What makes you think it would occur in the twisted > segment? Morning DLUNU, thanks to your minders for letting you out to play again today. Now if you were concerned about different twist rates for different pairs in a cable, the crosstalk you're worried about must occur in the 'twisted segment', no? If it occurred only at the terminations the twist rates of the various pairs could be the same with no penalty? See the argument? In telephone cables there were rules set out ages ago to try to minimise crosstalk by choosing pairs in appropriate groups in big transmission cables, I was just wondering if it was a real problem in Ethernet cables or even Ethernet patch cords? Seems unlikely but I wondered if there were any standards on this.