Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ralph Spitzner Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking Subject: Re: HTTP over both TCP and UDP Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 09:54:00 +0100 Organization: Hanswurst & Kaspar Hauser Ltd. Lines: 24 Message-ID: <8e6rrb-rp.ln1@spitzner.org> References: <5e0b3b3c-4c23-4bdb-908b-864af1276ec1@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <87iqks4f38.fsf@com.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f765b26fea2777394750e486946877c0"; logging-data="8709"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/sxTzucM449wZ4WbowAkllSyCUXISyavI=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32.1 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:Tam2LluSl6+zoJEk73Bhia4NjXA= Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.networking:3278 Tauno Voipio wrote: [lots of txt] > Maybe I'm completely retarded, but HTTP _over_ UDP ? Occurs to me the server would never be able to tell when it's 'served' a page, unless some ACK's are implemented, what in turn is just TCP. Enlighten me someone on the the use of HTTP over UDP. [i.e. why not just send some data over UDP, don't care whether it's there or not instead of dealing with headers like Connection: keep-alive which is impossible anyway et al.] -- Mostly harmless... -Douglas Adams