Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: What distros *don't* use systemd ?
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:52:45 +0100
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <tf31eb-9s8.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net>
References: <lu5np1$u6d$2@dont-email.me> <op.xlk6ccdqa3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net> <luis5e$v1h$3@dont-email.me> <p9tvdb-ptn.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net> <lukfpv$ht3$2@dont-email.me> <c75v84FttjfU1@mid.individual.net> <lukjdr$hh1$1@dont-email.me> <luklck$7on$1@news.albasani.net> <lqvboy9ii9.fsf@pia.msmri.medicine.ubc.ca> <lukm92$9fo$2@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net Q/PtutL1x9BOEVg+UNIqwwPoEO5vyxby5WhG4Rmw+PNqES5svm
X-Orig-Path: squidward.local.dionic.net!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:X2NbSRwzSOr0fXkjyQTfNdyYHoQ=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
In-Reply-To: <lukm92$9fo$2@news.albasani.net>
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:12030

On 08/09/14 17:42, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> Its another mess that grew like topsy and should have been ironed out
> years ago.

IMHO the correct response to sendmail is

apt-get install exim4

OK - even exim takes some getting used to - but it is clean, very 
powerful and a simple config is pretty simple. A clever config is still 
readable.

and it is *very* robust IME.