Path: csiph.com!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.alt.net!not-for-mail
From: owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 03:23:31 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: O.W.L.
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <suz7993g.vgui4@rooftop.invalid>
References: <qe5e54$opq$1@neodome.net> <qe6r9m$7vi$1@neodome.net> <qe81p4$4t6$1@gonzo.revmaps.no-ip.org> <87o92vkihl.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <szbo9to3a.y4@rooftop.invalid> <0a8ptf-ogu.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <qed2rv$jos$1@dont-email.me> <7mgptf-cg4.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <ghiz003.agp5au@rooftop.invalid> <10eqtf-scp.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <y7820qr.qh3@rooftop.invalid> <qeeof9$qbr$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: boom.rooftop.invalid
X-Face: $BHf)vM$6p_?9L`jmOQ54JeNyL+%MZGGRfH8&grb[Y%-jU`MCPAQN=/SVDa{<KrBxl"%XcV >(/67bP(YB}rjV^h><g$kPGE_caHX,aa}4A1~sto7YJo#ob/SgNiMsoaMMXiOX9%DjyJM_-=$`F5b' JM,?/R/;V1RI%|eClL6ymI}LbZERB=q+"pJ)uI{ngj1DRF1;E5[r$f[4mgt9=7Pw@vl8@I%eYs6KWJ e%LU3#U@M[X^YBp2VY]-'1*reGDbk%#n1ve'*RffQ3j,(TCYivjb*M`qmuC5rHgbN)nSsx)697q/vt //''?=gM'C.salgG^f)>cUh
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:27305 alt.os.linux:57018

In comp.os.linux.misc Dan Espen <dan1espen@gmail.com> wrote:
> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> writes:
> 
>> Yep.  '8w' is more efficient than '40l' for a guess at jumping to a word
>> near the middle of a line, and definitely more efficient than
>> 'llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll'
> 
> Actually, all those "l"s are one keystroke.
> Assuming you've let your keyboard do auto-repeat.
> Looks like 1 keystroke vs 2 or 3.
> 

A 1.5-second keystroke.  No thanks.