Path: csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail From: owl Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux Subject: Re: Linux Command-Line Editors Vulnerable to High-Severity Bug Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 20:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Organization: O.W.L. Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <87o92vkihl.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <0a8ptf-ogu.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <7mgptf-cg4.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <10eqtf-scp.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> NNTP-Posting-Host: boom.rooftop.invalid Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Face: $BHf)vM$6p_?9L`jmOQ54JeNyL+%MZGGRfH8&grb[Y%-jU`MCPAQN=/SVDa{(/67bP(YB}rjV^h>cUh Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:27287 alt.os.linux:57003 In comp.os.linux.misc Georges wrote: > Le 19/06/2019 à 22:10, owl a écrit : > > snip > >>> >> >> Yep. '8w' is more efficient than '40l' for a guess at jumping to a word >> near the middle of a line, and definitely more efficient than >> 'llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll' >> > > place on the beginning of the word you like > or > /\ > > ma (mark a) > > navigate thru the file... > > 'a -> the beginning of the line containing the mark "a" > `a -> the word marked "a" > > ;) > Yes, but I'm talking about general navigation, not finding a particular word, which even within a sentence would require typing more characters than just '8w'. Then you can fine-tune the location if necessary with h and l.