Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Baho Utot Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: What distros *don't* use systemd ? Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:32:47 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <89j5ib-4k9.ln1@raspberry-pi.bildanet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="36289f8929254428b33b881414c6f292"; logging-data="4507"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18BKkjyrXbRj4pAZk7JtWXcmWbzYhfwkAY=" User-Agent: KNode/4.14.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:che9wUSq/SnsSedNLJgSnRR1kVQ= Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:12555 Aragorn wrote: > On Tuesday 28 October 2014 23:53, Baho Utot conveyed the following to > comp.os.linux.misc... >> Actually it ( systemd ) caused me to move to FreeBSD after using linux >> since 1995. Systemd is an abortion. > > Debian Wheezy currently still supports sysvinit - and Debian is set to > vote again on the systemd issue for Jessie and Sid - as well as Gentoo's > openRC and Ubuntu's Upstart, both of which are wrappers around sysvinit. > Slackware still uses a BSD-style init. > > FreeBSD is a nice operating system but it runs far behind on GNU/Linux > in terms of hardware support, so there was no need to switch to FreeBSD > per se, given that the above-mentioned distros still support sysvinit. > FreeBSD if far better for me than any of the current linuxes. There was every need to switch to FreeBSD. FreeBSD is extremely easy for me to admin where linux is a F'n nightmare. I have had almost zero problems setting up my FreeBSD servers and desktops where with linux it's jesus christ who the hell changed that!