Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E. R." Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Another ssh quirk... Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 12:02:38 +0200 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <11a05ig$2pnll$1@news.xmission.com> <6ac430ec@news.ausics.net> <6ac4741b@news.ausics.net> <6ac56e50@news.ausics.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net BXfVnFKUj060EDqtwYXMtgC1HgnDpF10TxA/2fnkgpUiIQXTHJ Cancel-Lock: sha1:xL1Q2NlYAOb+j7FAKdY42uGJ4fM= sha256:WKlr+flvtbyrdh+djtSjYpMuHQhA8O8ElIsgORguHs4= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:93105 On 2026-10-07 09:47, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > c186282 writes: >> 'sftp' works fine BUT used AS ftp it's more >> complicated to work with. 'scp' kinda hides >> most of the complexity - security without >> all the BS. >> >> BUT, remember, you may have to open the correct >> ports for both SSH and SFTP ..... > > Are you somehow under the impression that you need to open more than one > port for SSH and SFTP? > Maybe thinking of ftps. -- Cheers, Carlos E.R. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.