Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: [OT] energy
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 14:46:20 +0200
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <nik8ssFppsiU9@mid.individual.net>
References: <118cshs$2v7m0$1@dont-email.me> <119g9cr$386na$2@dont-email.me> <6abbbf76$0$87034$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <119gghl$3bbn1$1@dont-email.me> <6abbc8f1$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <119go8s$3enav$1@dont-email.me> <niel8vF21fuU1@mid.individual.net> <119tpjn$fb6$1@dont-email.me> <119u26h$3glq$5@dont-email.me> <119ulfj$bgfv$1@dont-email.me> <119vkuc$mtek$3@dont-email.me> <cpWdneQfD_v__173nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <nihmeeFfekcU4@mid.individual.net> <11a0f86$11hcr$5@dont-email.me> <nii59hFhu1lU3@mid.individual.net> <niiaj5Foo9pU38@mid.individual.net> <niictuFjb1jU2@mid.individual.net> <11a28ck$1n9ag$2@dont-email.me> <nijrmgFppsiU1@mid.individual.net> <11a2iug$1qr6j$3@dont-email.me> <nik3c1FppshU7@mid.individual.net> <11a2neo$1qr6j$14@dont-email.me> <nik69hFppsiU8@mid.individual.net> <11a2o1k$1qr6j$17@dont-email.me> <nik6j9FppshU10@mid.individual.net> <11a2q40$1qr6j$22@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net ItPcuHEhIBuD9F0a+7RvEAKUeLnMJgQ38DA7l4LyTdxcSu+IDv
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8bD3k1hwbt96QS+uFNpEk4m0cVU= sha256:MebB+qCrVAwqiSF3HeLJ36XodZUwDT7taMoH7+rT96I=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <11a2q40$1qr6j$22@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:93040

On 2026-10-06 14:38, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 06/10/2026 13:07, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> On 2026-10-06 14:03, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> On 06/10/2026 13:01, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>>>> Exactly confirms what I said. nucleår >19%.
>>>>> Solar 18.4%
>>>>>
>>>>> Your cognitive dissonance is showing...
>>>>
>>>> LOL. Just one percent. Will soon be surpassed. Add all renewable 
>>>> sources, and the figures change drastically.
>>>
>>> And that's why your grid crashed
>>>
>>
>> So, now you accept that we have a lot of green energy?  :-D
>>
>> No, green energy was not the cause, according to the reports.
>>
> Written by people who were responsible for the crash
> 

LOL.

-- 
Cheers,
        Carlos E.R.
        ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.