Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E. R." Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: [OT] energy Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 14:01:53 +0200 Lines: 84 Message-ID: References: <118cshs$2v7m0$1@dont-email.me> <119g9cr$386na$2@dont-email.me> <6abbbf76$0$87034$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <119gghl$3bbn1$1@dont-email.me> <6abbc8f1$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <119go8s$3enav$1@dont-email.me> <119tpjn$fb6$1@dont-email.me> <119u26h$3glq$5@dont-email.me> <119ulfj$bgfv$1@dont-email.me> <119vkuc$mtek$3@dont-email.me> <11a0f86$11hcr$5@dont-email.me> <11a28ck$1n9ag$2@dont-email.me> <11a2iug$1qr6j$3@dont-email.me> <11a2neo$1qr6j$14@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net qtF5uwBFPkYy+PndK9EV1A5k5XdFSLqQeRi6R9WEGrTQLLEDJS Cancel-Lock: sha1:0tvIz9GYefjPjipIWiM+h61XiQ4= sha256:k8tcOqadaopnwudUpqqwD6VS7iFZF/AI6M0UskNaYfw= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <11a2neo$1qr6j$14@dont-email.me> Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:93031 On 2026-10-06 13:52, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 06/10/2026 12:12, Carlos E. R. wrote: >> On 2026-10-06 12:36, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 06/10/2026 10:01, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Doesn't that show you that someone somewhere has been working very >>>>> hard on propaganda? >>>> >>>> No. I have not heard or seen propaganda anywhere. I just saw in the >>>> news the accidents of Chernobyl and Fukushima, >>> >>> Indeed. But did you ever see Banqiaou? Do you even remember Bhopal? >>> Would you be concerned about an ammonium nitrate store next to you? >> >> Yes. >> >>> What you saw in the news, *was* propaganda. That's why you remember >>> Fukushima, the nuclear power station that killed no one, instead of >>> Fukushima, the tsunami that killed 20,000 people. >> >> LOL. I also heard of the tsunami, and read detailed reports about the >> accident. Not propaganda. >> >>> >>>> and I don't want a nuclear power station 200Km from me. Nobody has >>>> to tell me that I should avoid nuclear. >>> >>> They already did *exactly* that. But they did it well enough that you >>> think you thought it all by yourself... >>> >>> There IS a nuclear power station 200km from you, in Cofrentes. 1GW >>> BWR, broadly similar in age and type to Fujkushima Daichi. >> >> >> Actually, 225 Km from me :-D >> >> Anyway, I was not asked about it when they built it. I would have >> voted for it at the time, though, but of course, Franco never asked. >> >>> It;s been supplying Valencias electricity for 40 years >>> >>> There are 7 active nuclear plants in Spain: they generate more >>> electricity than all the solar. >> >> Actual data contradicts you. >> >> Electricity Generation (2025 Data) >> >> • Nuclear Power: Generated around 51,800 to 52,390 GWh (roughly 52 >> TWh), accounting for about 19.0% to 19.98% of the national electricity >> mix. Spain operates 7 nuclear reactors across its fleet with a steady, >> high-capacity output. >> >> • Solar Photovoltaic (Utility/Grid-Connected): Generated a record >> 50,188 GWh (~50.2 TWh), accounting for 18.4% of the national >> electricity mix. >> > Exactly confirms what I said. nucleår >19%. > Solar 18.4% > > Your cognitive dissonance is showing... LOL. Just one percent. Will soon be surpassed. Add all renewable sources, and the figures change drastically. > > >> • Solar (Including Self-Consumption / Autoconsumo): When factoring in >> estimated residential and commercial rooftop solar self-consumption, >> total solar generation climbs higher, nudging past nuclear as solar >> reaches over 21% of total generation. >> > > Impossible to know. > Facts. Not fantasy > > > -- Cheers, Carlos E.R. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.