Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: OT: Does Computer Science Need Computers? Date: 5 Sep 2026 18:09:05 GMT Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <18d1ffe2a110b2ac$14913$961095$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <1gGdnQE9qPU9Wwb3nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net OlZd+ITa7truDz9dYPWKhwxBkOdQ5CqZO0vy1tp9zAevVqHizD Cancel-Lock: sha1:wA2HJacUbv1P2q8lYgjQMoMxNaQ= sha256:qQCisgCzameFQU93nBYUiNWkDD4oesnoObz9gsQIAiQ= User-Agent: Pan/0.165 (Kostiantynivka) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:91126 On Sat, 5 Sep 2026 03:36:51 -0400, c186282 wrote: > Anyway, 'upgraded' old FORTRAN routines for a long time. > Re-wrote them IN FORTRAN though, not 'C' or whatever. > Re-do FORTRAN in FORTRAN and everything is smooth, no 'alien' modules > to import. When almost all of the code base is C, FORTRAN would be a problem for future maintenance. I am familiar with FORTRAN. Most younger programmers aren't. There was precedent. The company had its own geodatabase and code based on DbVista. Way back when the interface was FORTRAN but it had been converted to C. That was before my time and I don't know the history or when Motif was selected for the GUI toolkit. https://cyber.dabamos.de/programming/modernfortran/motif.html Shudder...