Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Andy Burns Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Multi-Networking in Linux - Multiple Subnets Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2026 15:43:12 +0100 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <114fdad$1trk7$1@news1.tnib.de> <114kq1d$3joo1$1@dont-email.me> <114l17o$2ac1t$1@news1.tnib.de> <114l4n2$3nej4$2@dont-email.me> <114mfd5$2dmco$1@news1.tnib.de> <114nhge$gvl6$3@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net /nihBxv07Rz7510uraLE0wMxfMA1rLAgz3mMzAaymcHqZfoVIc Cancel-Lock: sha1:7YjVJYq31dOfo8VnlO1jdeMhyb8= sha256:0/FPMv7+BRtrs90MGC91IfnzW1m+KKnT5BBSfJeBaVE= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <114nhge$gvl6$3@dont-email.me> Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:89472 Nuno Silva wrote: > Andy Burns wrote: > >> Marc Haber wrote: >> >>> I'm done with this part of the discussion. >> >> That's the 2nd time you've promised that ... > > Maybe there was a collision in the medium and the first attempt was > aborted. Are we sure the thread is set to full-duplex in a full-duplex > capable medium? And not on a shared medium? I think it's more of an impedance mismatch between those who recognise that other people have similar levels of knowledge to their own, and people who assume their own knowledge is superior to everyone else's.