Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E. R." Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Multi-Networking in Linux - Multiple Subnets Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2026 22:57:51 +0200 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <114fdad$1trk7$1@news1.tnib.de> <114gf3s$24ndu$5@dont-email.me> <114i5nq$23pqk$1@news1.tnib.de> <114l12h$2aber$1@news1.tnib.de> <114l4ic$3nej4$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net j2jl1/qCKyKruukvybm7UQNmx833fLliUlqpgYWVoDye5nkfWA Cancel-Lock: sha1:4XC1Qvf+N3qdCP7h+1O8hazSUUw= sha256:TMBpw+T60VUHtd7elYr2e/msINuauVTcmALhVU1n31E= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <114l4ic$3nej4$1@dont-email.me> Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:89410 On 2026-08-01 17:49, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 01/08/2026 15:49, Marc Haber wrote: >> "Carlos E. R." wrote: >>> If it is wrong, you will have to explain. >> >> I did. >> > Not in any comprehensible form. Indeed. > I still dont have any real idea what you are saying. > At various times you have said > networking is classless > class Cs don't exist any more > RFC1918, which specifies classs Cs, is completely valid. > Honestly I haven't a clue what your point is and I am losing the will to > live https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1918 3. Private Address Space The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) has reserved the following three blocks of the IP address space for private internets: 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 (10/8 prefix) 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 (172.16/12 prefix) 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 (192.168/16 prefix) -- Cheers, Carlos E.R. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;