Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: OpenMandriva turmoil - sabotage? Date: 19 Jul 2026 01:14:04 GMT Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <112ncdq$5nuq$1@dont-email.me> <113e147$31u9i$1@dont-email.me> <113fh8t$3fccc$1@dont-email.me> <113g0l2$3jspa$2@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net IKHevUa5MDOjIGlspVL9pwiqnw0A+4qW0T0U+hsYZVfD4RtNcd Cancel-Lock: sha1:fYPpuUlgajdn2tB+IHvMY9ibUlQ= sha256:Gc154GOfrtqYNwjRwGBGJ4BBlBiCNo2ibDmMuSO3o0Y= User-Agent: Pan/0.165 (Kostiantynivka) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:88895 On Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:43:38 +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > Personally I consider the FSF position quixotic at best. Non-free > firmware only runs if you have the relevant device. If you don’t have > the device then it just sits harmlessly on disk - a minor waste of > space, but not any kind of real-life infringement of end user freedoms > of the kind the FSF cares about. Quixote is Stallman's middle name. Eric Raymond had it right. Raymond is nothing if not divisive but if the FSF had its way our choices would be very limited.