Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt Subject: Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip Date: 9 Jul 2026 01:20:14 GMT Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <111sup8$349r$3@toylet.eternal-september.org> <111tkdh$a0h0$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> <1120hkl$14c6l$2@toylet.eternal-september.org> <1121sth$1ie1h$1@dont-email.me> <112kv9c$3ee5r$1@dont-email.me> <112mlmv$2qd$3@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net dSdxXiRAA7g306R2Rxfdzg0MrjKpeIlZ9tDmin8NAE0z8vYx4/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:HazZ6a7ZMGNpsJEtdPHLflUZlhU= sha256:rKvW4Sb/wAfz7td8yDoEd40/aCYuQ5uRWxInlLHXAak= User-Agent: Pan/0.165 (Kostiantynivka) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:88799 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:44540 On Wed, 8 Jul 2026 23:15:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > But by regulating that energy barrier, you can modulate the amount of > particle current that crosses it, over a continuous range from off to > low to high, as opposed to completely off versus completely on. This > only works because of quantum theory. It's amazing how many things worked quite well prior to someone developing a theory.