Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.magic.secrets,alt.conspiracy Subject: Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip Date: 30 Jun 2026 23:45:53 GMT Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <111sup8$349r$3@toylet.eternal-september.org> <111tkdh$a0h0$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> <1120hkl$14c6l$2@toylet.eternal-september.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net kAvjzFGk8ibVLz3EmuXfJAzWNgNr8baPIzTLpZUiFsvKCQ4/ci Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ee/0jqdmre1XQFOT70X1P2iKsac= sha256:Q8Rl+eLhAhZXfu4oQRC+sd/S83nqo2ebi3+tjbemX04= User-Agent: Pan/0.165 (Kostiantynivka) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:88551 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:44489 alt.magic.secrets:295 alt.conspiracy:354112 On Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:06:38 -0400, c186282 wrote: > Any better future stuff will have to exploit quantum effects - get > more bang for yer nanometer. Alas quantum stuff isn't as > deterministic as bulk matter devices and suffer from the uncertainty > principle. Physics was a 4 semester course and the 4th was quantum when it started to get weird. On one essay test I wrote about Heisenberg's uncertainty principle versus Heidegger's principle uncertainty. Fortunately the professor had a sense of humor or maybe he realized how far off the beaten path the original quantum guys got when you start thinking about the Being of beings.