Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!panix!not-for-mail From: ruben safir Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Learning about the Kernal Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <3gamtb-4ep.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.57.23.82 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1426927523 15358 96.57.23.82 (21 Mar 2015 08:45:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:45:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:14182 On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 06:04:35 +0000, William Unruh wrote: >> Still not sure if the extra complexity has actually solved any >> problems!!! > > Well, EFI is supposed to allow for far greater flexibility in booting. > Both fedora and Mageia 5 seem to have gotten efi working. So, I think it > is not solving problems but "wouldn't it be nice if..." EFI is not one of the problems here. It is a virtualbox of a Dual Core Intel. the Bios doesn't even have any EFi settings. -- The Coin Hangout: http://www.coinhangout.com/home