Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Tim Watts Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: What distros *don't* use systemd ? Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 07:29:42 +0100 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <6o71eb-dgc.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 40pX11w2OLbzrwecPbVcPwwNiYnCI91NJABFXncKUehKqtFrBx X-Orig-Path: squidward.local.dionic.net!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:3AuQlZYXD8CN2DNp5EqGDF5ASSU= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:12065 On 09/09/14 01:49, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > The rationale appears to be 'faster booting' Sound like time to do a test - I have VMWare on my 6GB laptop. I'll pick a distribution where systemd is an option and try it with and without. Might be a day or two...