Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Tim Watts Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: How do home users of linux protect themselves against ill-advised changes? Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:35:49 +0000 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 1yv5XnnuiQ8yrfHIRSOscAhnGT0dN29yWWzpF7ISC/8ckZkRHd X-Orig-Path: squidward.dionic.net!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:IiNqIXANkMidyYuXFZDqb8M1qps= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:13263 On 05/01/15 13:21, Marc Haber wrote: > Jeremy Nicoll - news posts > wrote: >> Does anyone run with what you might call two or three generations of system >> bits of the OS - perhaps on two or three separate partitions, and apply >> fixes to one of them at a time? > > I used to do that. Way to complicated. A rescue system does the same > job and does not need that much maintenance. I run 2 root + boot FSs - so I can install the next version and still have my old system accessible while I debug and polish the new one. Also means I have my old /etc available too when booted to the new OS.