Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Tim Watts Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: What distros *don't* use systemd ? Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:06:44 +0100 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <2kqldb-3h6.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 9t9gpLcIivfuxIxiP3P4lggIkj5oOT0DBKDmMqnaV2ptSKrAq1 X-Orig-Path: squidward.local.dionic.net!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:Aihg14JQyouc9NAJgdW3eQdJ7kw= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:11939 On 04/09/14 13:22, Aragorn wrote: > I have for a long time already been saying that the latest generation of > GNU/Linux developers are not people who've been involved with UNIX > earlier, but people who come from the Windows world and have only > recently converted to GNU/Linux. At least Imperial College London still teach their CompSci course based primarily on linux PCs in the labs, so there's still hope :) > We see this, among other things, in the way that freedesktop.org has > dictated the rules for file managers, for instance. They now refer to > directories as "folders" - in just about every modern-day desktop > environment - and they insist on a volume-oriented approach to storage > via the "Places" menu in the file managers, and which was also already > present in GNOME 2. This volume-oriented approach to storage instead of > the more logical uniform directory tree of UNIX is not exclusive to > Microsoft Windows, of course, because Miguel de Icaza, who designed > GNOME (and who moonlights for Microsoft) is actually a Mac guy. > I was exposed to volumes on DEC VAX/VMS at around the same time I saw my first unix. Both seemed sensible (notwithstanding MS-DOS's stupid drive letters), but overall I think the unix way is neater.