Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Tim Watts Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y,uk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Parental guardian - internet (WEB) filtering Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:07:59 +0100 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Aj587v0uQpk5kjW1ibWHqANrAyPoQ9dS/r8O7RQ2H9mC+1H/1l X-Orig-Path: squidward.dionic.net!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:5/hvgaF/5o1Ay0iR6VNdrBOgY2U= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:14291 On 31/03/15 20:14, Bill wrote: > In message , Tim Watts > writes >> Please, no debates about the merits of this - >> >> I'm having trouble trying to find anything that might work. > > It might be worth mentioning that my brother-in-law had something > installed on his Windows PC. It was about 3 years ago, his first machine > and his first experience of computers and the internet, so he wanted to > keep visiting family safe. > > His granddaughter visited, accessed it and managed to lock him out. When > he discovered this, she was back at her home, and claimed innocence, no > knowledge of password etc. > > I think he ended up having to have the machine rebuilt from scratch. That's why we're doing it at the router :)