Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "john james" Newsgroups: uk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,uk.d-i-y Subject: Re: Opensource slowing down? "GoogleDrive" private cloud Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 05:40:58 +1100 Lines: 50 Message-ID: References: <4mVMw.1153453$rs3.1149704@fx05.am4> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net F0W7eFaZyweuRuaIRAQi2gXh1l73/XmkeVxE8h2ufhkcXWFAU= Cancel-Lock: sha1:5yVW8Vhf9KRkVVi7p0E5SyFXqy4= In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:14070 "Tim Watts" wrote in message news:c8udtb-anl.ln1@squidward.dionic.net... > On 14/03/15 11:56, 7 wrote: > >> I think what you are saying is you want to be able >> to do the same from Android and Chrome books? > > No - I'm not. > > My idea is a "disconnected aware" network protocol and client combo. > > I cannot rsync all my stuff to every device because the clients don't have > 3TB of storage. > > An ssh server is *adeqate* but not great. It does allow me to access any > file securely on demand. > > However, I've not found any clients (yet) for Android that let me choose > to cache offline copies of selected files or directories nicely. > > Also the SFTP clients don't really integrate with Android. > > This scenario: > > "I'm going to see Joe and he wants to look at the pics of Prague I took > last month. And there's no Internet down the pub where will will meet for > beer." > > 1) Google Drive: I can mark a whole bunch of stuff for offline access - > let it sync and off I go. > > 2) With SFTP I'd have to manually copy that over to the phone's storage > and any updates on the server would not get replicated. > > > > > So Google Drive does it right (TM) but with all the problems that it's not > secure (against the NSA/GCHQ etc) It's easy enough to add that by encrypting it before Google sees it. and Google could bugger me up. I > know this - > > So basically, SFTP is "just about good enough" but it's no where near > "great". >