Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Tim Watts Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: What distros *don't* use systemd ? Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:09:45 +0100 Lines: 14 Message-ID: <9e8mdb-b2e.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net> References: <2kqldb-3h6.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Ae2TDtmnKGvVI+yYdJ8auwbtbX4wQ0x48Sq6niw7cvGnyz3yix X-Orig-Path: squidward.local.dionic.net!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:LUnyHWicZ1Q4aA5Bj2cA4G3ZJmc= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:11940 On 04/09/14 13:26, Kenny McCormack wrote: > Red Hat has always been the Microsoft of the Linux world. I went off RedHat around the time I took over the kerberos side at a uni. Needed to patch the RPMs so I started with their source RPM. Strewth - it had something like 90 patches in it - about half of which were redundant (patch corrects problem that was eventually fixed properly upstream in the current source file). Took me about 3 days to pare it down to something sane. Then there were the lib dependencies...