Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Tim Watts Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: What distros *don't* use systemd ? Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 07:49:44 +0100 Lines: 7 Message-ID: <8dnqdb-ak6.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net> References: <2kqldb-3h6.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net qXJXnSgQw/O4HdcigrhjrwrGIYserXAEFuPDrovdBQQRy98mFT X-Orig-Path: squidward.local.dionic.net!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:NN9hYKoB3kGHLEjUrawiPgdq+T4= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:11980 On 06/09/14 02:52, William Unruh wrote: > As far as I know Debian has not yet implimented systemd. They are just > doing so, with a lot of argy bargy about it on the Debian newsgroups. > Once they do I suspect that they will also amalgamate those directories. If Debian goes stupid I might finally have to look at bsd...