Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Tim Watts Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: How do home users of linux protect themselves against ill-advised changes? Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 22:48:38 +0000 Lines: 16 Message-ID: <6vgrnb-rs8.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net EjM8pzJTqcPyCtEHd+yMswaNpWiiC3+nmercckqBLJIszrYYO8 X-Orig-Path: squidward.dionic.net!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:lAXYPzPqM/M2L7VMOr4wgrm4cnE= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:13308 On 05/01/15 22:25, Marc Haber wrote: > But, if it's your job, you should have spare hardware or VMs available > so that you do not need to risk your primary working tool. > > Greetings > Marc > That's valid - but there's nothing like testing a distro by real world daily use for a while :) Sure - using a VM is a good way to narrow the choices down by excluding the non starters - but for one it does not expose the OS to testing on real hardware (like pulling USB devices in and out, graphics, suspend/resume and many other real world tests.