Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!ALLTEL.NET-a2kHrUvQQWlmc!not-for-mail Subject: Re: Linux Shell Scripting Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc references: <113thaht9td8nduhtjhdr9onvsfgi9cdfd@4ax.com> <551E9AA1.1060905@notaserver.com> From: "Rinaldi J. Montessi" organization: http://www.federalist.com message-id: <551FD36D.8070007@notaserver.com> Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 07:05:01 -0500 user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:40.0) Gecko/2015033023 Firefox/40.0 SeaMonkey/2.37a1 mime-version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetserver.com Lines: 17 X-Trace: 0a245551fd37a7dc4117e32416 X-Received-Bytes: 1523 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2278820044 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:14326 Richard Kettlewell decreed, Read These Runes!: > William Unruh writes: >> Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote: >>> True, yet apropos \@ returns: >> >> Why would you lookup \@ when it is clearly an argument to zip.=20 >> Why not do apropos \-? or apropos z? >=20 > What=E2=80=99s with all the redundant backslashes in this thread? In my case it's because I didn't know that @ would be properly interpreted without being escaped. --=20 Every program has two purposes -- one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't.