Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Tim Watts Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: What distros *don't* use systemd ? Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:00:02 +0000 Lines: 26 Message-ID: <28g5ib-iv.ln1@squidward.dionic.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 6lOdN6uIxkcuCExB8K9vAQp31yyqKzMlOcNNvUP92x80xTLH7T X-Orig-Path: squidward.dionic.net!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:3OJNOtGKUifIBeaYBfj1sMOVHXw= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:12549 On 28/10/14 18:18, Dan Espen wrote: > Tim Watts writes: > >> On 28/10/14 16:35, Charles T. Smith wrote: >> >>> Nice, Dan. So, you're happy. Actually, you might not want to contribute >>> to the useless chatter then, and stay out of it. The OP asked a simple >>> question. How were your philosophies any way on-thread? >> >> "Philosophy" is a core and important part of any open source project, >> particularly one were ordinary folk can actually make desing choices >> at a modular level without being a coder. >> >> And a debate on systemd is far from useless IMHO. > > Charles just seems to thing it's off topic and therefore should > not be discussed. (Sort of a bizarre concept given that we're on > Usenet.) > > All this rabid anti-systemd stuff seems to me like a huge waste > of time. UNLESS someone has something better. > Well, I disagree with your POV but I defend your right to say it... I'll get me coat.