Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Ames Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Back To CS Basics. Fuck AI Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 10:04:37 -0700 Organization: A place where nothing fits quite right Lines: 29 Message-ID: <20261021100437.000079a4@gmail.com> References: <18dee4b6cab427fa$865$2574533$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <87ik32455m.fsf@solcaium.us> <11asf08$31lan$1@dont-email.me> <11asopt$33n8m$8@dont-email.me> <11asq8f$31lan$6@dont-email.me> <11astpf$33n8m$23@dont-email.me> <11at0ld$31lan$13@dont-email.me> <11at39s$33n8m$36@dont-email.me> <11at4hq$31lan$18@dont-email.me> <11atave$3bqcl$1@dont-email.me> <11atdrd$31lan$25@dont-email.me> <11atgrt$3bqcl$14@dont-email.me> <11atsb5$3edcf$1@dont-email.me> <11au3uo$3k12p$14@dont-email.me> <0t1dqmx8a1.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <11b286r$11pis$5@dont-email.me> <20261019150910.00001b26@gmail.com> <11b780p$2q6cj$2@dont-email.me> <20261020105404.000027e5@gmail.com> <11b9vno$3o235$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 17:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; logging-data="101147"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19u3sxycUiidym0lqBUrvTg0OfsDzWdyAk="; posting-host="c962c47e619982db4ba3f6b7aa989201" Cancel-Lock: sha1:GtI0R0/ibpNk8B0LHAdQ9P6bU3M= sha256:17RtYlVS/nXV/GeXyxhxxV+CPOEwH1NfH28G9Cg4+IE= sha1:xMJMUT52NOf4LgR/WV+ZPAETmXs= sha256:zKYxFxYVkzsd1qAHSw6RSwcjAF9S6+CqxaGL6fV1WRc= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:94499 On Wed, 21 Oct 2026 09:13:29 -0000 (UTC) Tapiro Ubriaco wrote: > > I don't have to "believe" anything here; the fact that mathematics > > is innately complete and inherent to reality is self-demonstrating, > > as any child who's ever learned to count should know. Have two, get > > two, have four - that's addition, and it was so before the very > > first hominid who stopped to *think* about the number of tasty bits > > of fruit and game in his private cache. > > Then again, it's self evident that the inner angles of a triangle > always sum up to a straight angle. > > Any child who has tried to cut a triangle out of a sheet of paper, > and then cut the angles and lay them adjacent to one another should > know. > > A more adventurous child might have tried to do that with a triangle > drawn on an orange, or a balloon... and found out they don't > necessarily add up :-) > > That child would have then found out the need to systematise geometry > and distinguish between Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries with > their axioms and rules of inference... :-) Sure - but this is also discoverable, as your own example shows. It's certainly quicker and easier to learn from someone who already knows, but it's *possible* to work this stuff out independently.