Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Rod Speed" Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,alt.comp.periphs.hdd Subject: Re: A dying very old HDD confirmed? Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:37:40 +1000 Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net Tb8SDNpWF+aaI7f9Jd+VvQNRYV9/LOINt7tz2P4MOB/MsmGdc= Cancel-Lock: sha1:P0x/4q7mkSWKdwG0uhikehGvg/M= In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.hardware:2341 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage:5421 "Måns Rullgård" wrote in message news:yw1xtx9lxhm3.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com... > "Rod Speed" writes: > >> "Vic RR Garcia" wrote in message >> news:HAx5v.58842$Pk4.7889@fx28.iad... >>> On 04/22/14 07:59, Måns Rullgård wrote: >>>> "Rod Speed" writes: >>>> >>>>> Ant wrote >>>>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>>>> Ant wrote >>>>> >>>>>>>> Those results look bad? :( >>>>> >>>>>>> Not too bad if they don't keep increasing. >>>>> >>>>>> Really? >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, a few reallocated sectors are no big deal on a drive >>>>> that old. Some of those older drives don't handle mains >>>>> failure that well and can produce a bad sector that way >>>>> and then just reallocate that bad sector. >>>> >>>> Disks are so cheap there's no reason not to replace them at first sign >>>> of trouble. >>> >>> +1 to that! >>> Any disk, over 3 years old and under 250 GB, just replace it at >>> first sight of problems. >> >> I don’t bother with drives that small and it works fine to keep using >> drives which only have a few reallocated sectors. > > Drives work fine until they don't. Hardly any of mine have ever died. They mostly get replaced because they are too small.